10Feb2013, 10:30 PM
Join Date: Oct 2006
Thanked 2,238 Times in 549 Posts
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the deviated Ahmadiyyah/Qadiyani Sect
Mirza Ghulam Ahmad and the Qadiyani Sect
<table class="inner" style="width: 650px; margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto; border: 0px solid green; padding-left: 7px; padding-right: 7px; font-family: 'Times New Roman', Times, serif; text-align: justify; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);" border="0" cellpadding="0" cellspacing="1" width="100%"><tbody><tr><td valign="top" width="100">AUTHOR:</td><td class="article style5 style2" style="font-size: small; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">Imaam Muhammad Naasir-ud-Deen Al-Albaanee</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="100">SOURCE:</td><td class="article style5 style2" style="font-size: small; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">Al-‘Aqeedah At-Tahaawiyyah – Sharh wa Ta’leeq (pg. 39-40)</td></tr><tr><td valign="top" width="100">PRODUCED BY:</td><td class="article style5 style2" style="font-size: small; font-family: 'Times New Roman';">Al-Ibaanah.com</td></tr></tbody></table>
The Prophet (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) informed his ummah in many ahaadeeth, advising and cautioning them, that there would be many imposters (Dajjaaleen) after him. In some narrations, he (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said:“Everyone will claim to be a prophet, whereas I am the seal of the prophets – there being no prophet after me.”[Reported by Muslim and others; See al-Ahaadeeth as-Saheehah: no. 1683]
Amongst these imposters was Mirza Ghulam Ahmad Al-Qadiyani who claimed prophethood for himself. He has followers spread throughout India, Germany, England and America. And they have masaajid which they use to misguide the Muslims. There were some individuals amongst them in Syria as well, but Allaah uprooted them and eradicated them.
They have many vile beliefs apart from their belief that prophethood continued after Muhammad (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam). The one who preceded them in this belief is Ibn ‘Arabee, the Sufi. They have authored a treatise on this subject in which they have collected statements from him that serve as support for this afore-mentioned belief of theirs. And the mashaayikh were not able to refute it because it was from that which Ibn ‘Arabee said (!!) even though they asserted with certainty that they were disbelievers. There is no room to mention their beliefs here.
No doubt they are the ones whom the Messenger of Allaah intended when he (sallAllaahu ‘alayhi wa sallam) said in the hadeeth that has been authentically reported from him: “There will be lying impostors during the Last Days that will bring you narrations, which neither you nor your forefathers heard of. So beware and let them beware, lest they misguide you and bring calamity upon you.” [Reported by the author (i.e. At-Tahaawee) in Mushkil-ul-Athaar (4/104). It is also found in Saheeh Muslim (1/9)]
From their most distinguishing signs is that when they begin speaking about their Call (i.e. beliefs), before everything, they start out with affirming the death of ‘Eesaa (Jesus). When they are able to accomplish this – according to their perception – they proceed onto the next level, which involves mentioning the ahaadeeth that talk about the descent of ‘Eesaa, and make it clear that that they believe in these narrations. However, they then quickly move on to distorting their meanings by claiming that what is meant by them is the descent of someone similar to ‘Eesaa (Jesus), since they have already established and confirmed – according to their views – that ‘Eesaa (Jesus) died. So they claim that this person was Ghulam Ahmad Al-Qadiyani!
They have many, many other examples of distorting texts similar to this, which leads us to believe that they are a group from amongst the heretical Baatinees. We will point out some of their deviant beliefs soon by the Will of Allaah.
From the misguided beliefs of the Qadiyanis is that they reject the Jinn as being a creation apart from mankind. So they distort the apparent meaning of all the ayaat and ahaadeeth that clearly prove their existence and their distinction from mankind amongst creation, instead claiming that these texts refer to humans themselves or a specific group from amongst mankind. This is even the case with Iblees (i.e. the Devil) himself as they allege that he was a human being that was evil! So how misguided they are!!
Published: January 31, 2006